Static Stress Analysis of Fork on Rubber Slab Lifting Aid using Finite Element Method

Authors

  • Ananda Thomas Khoirullah Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Rachmat Dwi Sampurno Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Sailon Sailon Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Tri Satya Ramadhoni Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Syamsul Rizal Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Rizky Brillian Yuliandi Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53893/ijmeas.v2i3.316

Keywords:

static stress analysis, fork, finite element method, simulation

Abstract

The focus of this research is to simulate the static stress on the fork component of the tool to analyze the strength and feasibility of the design. The simulation used a method called Finite Element Method (FEA), which allows to find any problems before the prototype is made. The material used is ASTM A36 steel with a yield strength value of 250 MPa. The loading used is 300 kg with the direction of the force centered on the y-axis of the beam right in the middle of the object. With variable fork design dimensions that have been simplified in the form of 762x101.6x31.75 mm; 1219.2x127x44.45 mm; and 2133.6x152.4x50.8 mm, the distribution of analysis results consisting of maximum bending stress, moment, displacement, and factor of safety is obtained. The maximum bending stress values for designs A, B, and C in the simulation are 65.688 MPa; 42.891 MPa; and 47.897 MPa, respectively, with moment values of 1121.283 N.m; 1793.758 N.m; and 3139.592 N.m. Meanwhile, the displacement values in the simulation results for each design are 2.508 mm; 2.992 mm; and 8.948 mm, respectively, with factor of safety values of 3.8; 5.8; and 5.2. Static stress analysis on the fork design produces analytical calculation values and simulation calculations with small tolerances. Based on the results of these calculations, it is concluded that the most optimal fork design is design B because it has a lower value of maximum bending stress and displacement, and has a higher factor of safety value than other designs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. R. E. Wiriyani, “Analisis pengendalian persedian bahan baku crumb rubber dengan metode EOQ (economic order quantity) pada PT. golden energi mandiangin,” J. Inov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2020, doi: 10.37338/ji.v3i1.77.

L. Fiorillo, M. Cicciù, C. D’Amico, R. Mauceri, G. Oteri, and G. Cervino, “Finite Element Method and von Mises Investigation on Bone Response to Dynamic Stress with a Novel Conical Dental Implant Connection,” Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/2976067.

J. Wu, “Finite element analysis and simulation of cargo fork dynamics,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2419, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2419/1/012072.

Y. Jie, H. Fa-Guo, and Z. Xin-Jia, “Manual Hydraulic Forklift Fork Analysis Based on ANSYS Workbench,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Yanshan District: Guilin University of Technology, 2019, pp. 91–95. doi: 10.1145/3378065.3378083.

Y. Zhuang, Z. De Shan, and Q. Zhang, “Finite element analysis of a forklift truck mast system,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 494–495, no. 2, pp. 668–672, 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.668.

Meryanalinda, M. Sochib, and A. Habibullah, “Analisis Variasi Sudut Kampuh V Terhadap Sifat Mekanik Sambungan Las Baja ASTM A36,” J. Keilmuan dan Terap. Tek., vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 49–58, 2021, http://journal.unigres.ac.id/index.php/WahanaTeknik/article/view/1444

D. Eusebio, “Forklift Fork Dimensions and Types How Are Forks Measured ?,”. https://www.bigrentz.com/blog/forklift-fork-dimensions/ (accessed on Sep. 09, 2024).

D. Arifianto, “Studi Perilaku Sambungan T-Joint Pipa Baja akibat Beban Cyclic dengan Simulasi Finite Element Method,” INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER SURABAYA, 2015. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/291469966.pdf

D. Mungil Kurniawati and J. Michael Sukanda, “Simulasi Numerik Pengaruh Aspect Ratio dan Sudut Serang Terhadap Performa Turbin Angin Sumbu Vertikal H-Rotor,” Rotasi, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/rotasi.22.1.22-28.

H. Raharjo and S. E. Susilowati, “Pengaruh Kekuatan Bending dan Tarik Bahan Komposit Berpenguat Sekam Padi dengan Matrik Urea Formaldehide,” J. Kaji. Tek. Mesin, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–93, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.52447/jktm.v1i2.460.

T. S. Ramadhoni et al., “Static Analysis of Electric Vehicle Prototype Frame,” Int. J. Mech. Energy Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2024, doi: 10.53893/ijmeas.v2i1.242.

P. A. Setyarto, N. Mulyaningsih, and S. Hastuti, “Analisis Pengaruh Variasi Media Pendingin terhadap Kekuatan Bending Sambungan Pengelasan SMAW Material Baja ASTM A36,” in Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Magelang: Universitas Tidar, 2023, pp. 1–5. https://journal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/senaster/article/download/722/333/5077

L. A. N. Wibawa, “Desain dan Analisis Tegangan Alat Pengangkat Roket Kapasitas 10 Ton Menggunakan Metode Elemen Hingga,” J. Energi dan Teknol. Manufaktur, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 23–26, 2019, doi: 10.33795/jetm.v2i01.31.

A. Pratama and D. Agusman, “Analysis Kekuatan Kontruksi Rangka Pada Perancangan Design Belt Conveyor Menggunakan Ansys Workbench,” J. Sain dan Tek., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2023, doi: 10.37577/sainteks.v5i1.3.

C. G. Dengiz, M. C. Şenel, K. Yıldızlı, and E. Koç, “Design and Analysis of Scissor Lifting System by Using Finite Elements Method,” Univers. J. Mater. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 2018, doi: 10.13189/ujms.2018.060202.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Khoirullah, A. T., Sampurno, R. D., Sailon, S., Ramadhoni, T. S., Rizal, S., & Yuliandi, R. B. (2024). Static Stress Analysis of Fork on Rubber Slab Lifting Aid using Finite Element Method. International Journal of Mechanics, Energy Engineering and Applied Science (IJMEAS), 2(3), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.53893/ijmeas.v2i3.316