Optimizing Basement Construction Methods

Authors

  • Nguyen Huu Bao Dong Nai Technology University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v1i3.62

Keywords:

Divide and Conquer , Optimizing , Top-Down Method

Abstract

The underground part of SSG TOWER includes 4 basements, 4 basements at a height of -13.2m. Combined with the construction of 3m deep foundation, therefore, the minimum excavation depth is required to -16.2m. Due to the construction work in residential area, relatively ground, with large excavation depth and geology of the interaction area (clay layer up to 30m), the options for using diaphragm wall with drilled piles Small area, Laser piles or solier piles to make retaining walls during construction do not have that feature, so the author chooses the option of using reinforced concrete barrette walls for retaining walls during construction and as tunnel walls for this project.

The semi-topdown construction method was chosen to ensure safety during construction because the excavation depth of the work is quite large and the geology of this area is quite weak. This measure completely solves the strut system because using the floor structure of the building to support this system has high stability. Limiting the influence of settlement, cracking, and slippage to neighboring works a lot. Fast construction but in return for high technical requirements, high construction costs. Choose diaphragm wall thickness of 1.0m, base depth of 46.6m including standard barrete panels.

 The author uses 2D Plaxis simulation to calculate ground stability, stress and displacement, moment, and shear force generated in diaphragm wall during basement construction. The author analyzes using the optimization algorithm to compare and find the suitable solution.

References

Dung Tien Construction Company Ltd “Analysing and selecting construction method for Sacombank Buiding’s basement report”, 2010

Bui Q T Graduate thesis “Analyze the behavior of diaphragm wall during excavation and construction of the basement floor” HoChiMinh city University of Technology. p71-108, 2011

Ke Ng B “Design And Construction Of Deep Foundation Pit Construction Publisher”.2002

Lan Transport & Authority “Bottom-Up & Top-Down Construction Method”, 2005.

http://dungtien.com/en/project/done-project [6] Brinkgreve R B J, Vermeer P A 1998 PLAXIS 2D Foundation Version 7 Manual Balkema A A Rotterdam Brookfield Netherlands

Huynh Van Hoang, Tran Thi Hong, Le Hong Son.” Steel structure of lifting equipment”. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House.

TCVN 4244:2005 – “Lifting equipment: Design, manufacture and technical inspection”, Hanoi, 2006.

Verschoof J. - Cranes –“ Design, Practice, and Maintenance, 2nd Ed., Professional Engineering Publishing Limited”, London and Bury St Edmunds, UK, 2002

Kolarov I. “Metal structure of material handling machines”, Technica, Sofia

Trinh Dong Tinh, “Effect of calculated loads and structural parameters on the optimal size of the main girder of the two-girder box-type crane”, scientific report on the occasion of 55 years of establishment of Hanoi University of Science and Technology. Interior, 2011

Nguyen Hong Tien, 2013. “Optimal design of crane steel structure. Thesis of Master of Science in Engineering Mechanics”, University of Science and Technology – Hanoi, 2013.

Additional Files

Published

2021-12-26

How to Cite

Bao, N. H. (2021). Optimizing Basement Construction Methods. International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS), 1(3), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v1i3.62