Summary of Audit Judgment from Auditor Experience, Task Complexity, Professional Skepticism, and Goal Orientation

Authors

  • Putri Regina Abimanyu Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Rita Martini Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Desi Indriasari Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v4i2.314

Abstract

The goal of this study was to gather empirical evidence about the effects of auditor experience, task complexity, professional scepticism, and goal orientation on audit judgement. This study's population and sample included 35 respondents, all of whom worked as auditors for the South Sumatra Inspectorate. Questionnaires on a Likert scale of 1 to 5 were distributed directly to auditors to collect data. The data is analysed using Structural Equation Modelling using Partial Least Squares (PLS) and SmartPLS 4.0. The findings of this study revealed that auditor experience and professional scepticism have a favourable and significant effect on audit judgement. Meanwhile, task complexity and goal orientation have a positive but not statistically significant effect on audit judgement. Additionally, auditor experience, task complexity, professional scepticism and goal orientation influence audit judgement at the Inspectorate of South Sumatra Province by 50.6%.

References

M. I. Siwy, D. P. E. Saerang, and H. Karamoy, “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) untuk Menunjang Tingkat Kewajaran Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kota Manado,” J. Ris. Akunt. Audit. “Goodwill,” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 809–820, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v7i2.13549.

R. Martini, K. Amelia, and Y. Dwitayanti, "Implementation of Government Internal Control System and Organizational Commitment’s Impact on Fraud". In International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2022 (iCAST-SS 2022) (pp. 468-471). Atlantis Press.

N. Ulandari, “Pengaruh Gender, Keahlian Audit, dan Tekanan Ketaatan terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris Pada Inspektorat Kota Pariaman dan Kabupaten Padang Pariaman),” J. Akunt., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/akt/article/view/3779

K. Ultra Meza, R. Martini, and R. Armaini, “Determinan Opini Audit atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Se-Sumatera,” J. Ris. Terap. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 152–160, 2023, [Online]. Available: www.bpk.go.id.

R. Wahyudi, R. Martini, R. N. Ramadhana, K. R. Sari, and D. Amri, “Internal Controls, Investigative Audits, and Forensic Accounting Can Help Prevent Fraud,” in Proceedings of the 7th FIRST 2023 International Conference on Global Innovations (FIRST-T3 2023), 2024, pp. 48–52. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-220-0_6.

D. Indah Sari and E. Ruhiyat, “Pengaruh Locus of Control, Tekanan Ketaatan dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgment,” J. ASET (Akuntansi Riset), vol. 9, no. 2, p. 23, 2017, doi: 10.17509/jaset.v9i2.9230.

S. Ayudia, “Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Pengetahuan dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment dengan Kompleksitas Tugas sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris Pada KAP Pekanbaru, Padang dan Medan),” J. Fak. Ekon., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 169, 2015.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia, “Standar Audit 200 (Revisi 2021): Tujuan Keseluruhan Auditor Independen dan Pelaksanaan Audit Berdasarkan Standar Audit. ”Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 2021.

M. Kusumawaty and K. Krisnahari, “Tekanan Ketaatan dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment,” Balanc. J. Akunt. dan Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 146, 2022, doi: 10.32502/jab.v7i2.5383.

A. T. Rahim and E. NR, “Pengaruh Independensi, Keahlian Auditor, dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment: Studi Empiris pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Barat,” J. Eksplor. Akunt., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 376–389, 2024, doi: 10.24036/jea.v6i1.1183.

I. W. S. Wibhawa, W. Julianto, and A. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengalaman dan Tekanan Ketaatan terhadap Audit Judgement,” Pros. Biema, vol. 1, 2020.

N. D. J. Azizah and R. Pratono, “Pengaruh Locus of Control, Independensi, Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Gender terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Surabaya),” Liability, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 106–126, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uwks.ac.id/index.php/liability/article/view/881

P. A. M. Dilla, “Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi dan Skeptisme Profesional terhadap Kualitas Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Provinsi Bali),” Hita Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 2, no. 2, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.32795/hak.v2i2.1548.

S. A. Karimullah and E. Yuyetta, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment dengan Task Complexity sebagai Pemoderasi (Studi Kasus pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Semarang),” Diponegoro J. Account., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

N. Darmayanti, M. A. Wafa, A. M. Dientri, and R. N. Anggraeni, “Pengaruh Self-Efficacy, Goal Orientation and Obedience Pressure terhadap Audit Judgement,” J. Anal. Akunt. dan Perpajak., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2023.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan 1. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

I. Ghozali and H. Latan, Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2015.

W. W. Chin and A. Todd, “On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution,” MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249690.

A. Wijaya, Metode Penelitian Menggunakan SmartPLS 3.0. Yogyakarta: Innosain, 2019.

B. J. H. Ratag, S. Werimon, and Syarifudin, “Pengaruh Pengalaman Audit, Keahlian Audit, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgment Auditor (Studi Pada BPK-RI Perwakilan Provinsi Papua Barat),” JFRES J. Fisc. Reg. Econ. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2021, doi: 10.36883/jfres.v4i1.54.

A. M. Usman, R. DM, and S. Sjarlis, “Pengaruh Pengalaman, Pengetahuan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Audit Judgment Pada Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Bantaeng,” J. Cash Flow, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–24, 2022.

S. N. A. Gulo, W. A. Andriyanto, and Gur, “Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Skeptisisme Profesional terhadap Audit Judgment,” Pros. Biema, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 267–286, 2021.

H. Tibe and N. N. S. R. T. Dewi, “Penaruh Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengalaman Auditor, Skeptisme dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Kasus Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali),” J. Res. Accounting(JARAC), vol. 01, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2019.

I. B. A. Yasa, I. K. Sukayasa, and N. M. W. D. Pratiwi, “The Role of Self-Efficacy Mediating the Effect of Goal Orientation and Task Complexity on Judgment Audit Performance,” Soc. Sci. Track (iCASTSS 2019), vol. 354, pp. 205–209, 2019, doi: 10.2991/icastss-19.2019.43.

M. A. Faqih, M. Akbar, and F. A. Kurniawan, “The Effect of Purpose Orientation, Self-Efficacy, Pressure Obedience, and Task Complexity on Audit Judgment (Study Inspectorate In Madura),” Int. Colloq. Forensic Account. Gov., vol. 2, no. 1, 2022.

C. D. Astuti, E. P. Sihotang, L. Wahyuni, and S. Dizar, “The Effect Determinant Factors of Audit Judgment in the Government Sector,” Proc. 3rd Borobudur Int. Symp. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021 (BIS-HSS 2021), pp. 778–782, 2023, doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_131.

V. Yowanda, “Pengaruh Skeptisme, Pengalaman Auditor, dan Self Efficacy terhadap Audit Judgement pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Medan,” J. Ilm. ESAI Vol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 124–140, 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25181/esai.v13i2.1275.

Additional Files

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Abimanyu, P. R., Martini, R., & Indriasari, D. (2024). Summary of Audit Judgment from Auditor Experience, Task Complexity, Professional Skepticism, and Goal Orientation. International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS), 4(2), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v4i2.314