The Analysis of Understanding in Seismic – Resilient Infrastructure Planning in Vocational Student’s Civil Engineering

Lisherly Reginancy Debataraja; Oktavia Ully Artha Silalahi; Fenny Novita Meysabed Sianturi; Pagit Juni Sartika Br Tarigan; Dine Noviandri Badriansyah

doi:10.53893/ijrvocas.v3i4.44

Authors

Lisherly Reginancy Debataraja Politeknik Negeri Medan
Oktavia Ully Artha Silalahi Politeknik Negeri Medan
Fenny Novita Meysabed Sianturi Politeknik Negeri Medan
Pagit Juni Sartika Br Tarigan Politeknik Negeri Medan
Dine Noviandri Badriansyah Politeknik Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v3i4.44

Keywords:

Seismic-Resilient Infrastructure Understanding, Earthquake Resistance Management Understanding, Structural Earthquake Resistance Understanding, Infrastructure Earthquake Resistance Understanding

Abstract

The analysis of understanding in Seismic-Resilient Infrastructure Planning among vocational students in civil engineering is indispensable for multifaceted reasons. This study employs a questionnaire validation test as a means of data collection, utilizing questionnaires to gather information. Simple random sampling was applied to select respondents from Medan State Polytechnic students in their 5th and 7th semesters. The questionnaire is designed to assess students' knowledge of earthquake-resistant infrastructure planning. The research is structured into three segments, focusing on the understanding of earthquake resistance management, structural earthquake resistance, and infrastructure earthquake resistance. The aspect of management seismic resilience understanding ranges from 3.22% to 9.65%. The highest understanding is observed in the awareness of quality control activities, the fifth assessment (9.65%). The lowest understanding is in reduce errors in the implementation of earthquake-resistant construction, the nineth assessment (3.22%). The aspect of structure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 2.78% to 9.48%. The highest understanding is observed in threaded reinforcement, the fourth assessment (9.48%). The lowest understanding is in earthquake-resistant house construction, the seventh assessment (2.78%). The aspect of infrastructure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 5.57% to 15.83%., The highest understanding is observed in earthquake-resistant foundations, the second assessment (15.83%). The lowest understanding is in post-disaster assessment approach, the fifth assessment (5.57%). These percentages likely represent the level of comprehension or proficiency of students in each respective aspect, with higher percentages indicating a better understanding. It is crucial to analyze these results collectively and over time to identify trends, strengths, and areas for improvement in the seismic resilience education provided to vocational civil engineering students.

References

M. L. Tan, L. J. Vinnell, A. P. M. Valentin, R. Prasanna, and J. S. Becker, “The public’s perception of an earthquake early warning system: A study on factors influencing continuance intention,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 97, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104032.

K. Pribadi and D. Kusumastuti, “LEARNING FROM RECENT INDONESIAN EARTHQUAKES: AN OVERVIEW TO IMPROVE STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE.” [Online]. Available: http://www.bmg.go.id

R. G. K. Pradoto, A. Oktavianus, K. S. Pribadi, I. M. A. B. Rasmawan, and L. D. Wulandari, “Palu Housing Reconstruction Process: Reviewing and Learning after the 2018 Earthquake,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1065/1/012057.

Y. Qiu, X. Yuan, Z. Cao, and J. Xu, “Reinvestigation on the Liquefied Sites in the Tangshan Earthquake.”

M. Karya Kesehatan et al., “Aan Nuraeni: Education Methods to Improve Earthquake Preparedness Among Students: A Literature Review Education Methods to Improve Earthquake Preparedness Among Students: A Literature Review,” 2023.

H. B. Ozmen, “A view on how to mitigate earthquake damages in Turkey from a civil engineering perspective,” Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 2021, doi: 10.17515/resm2020.231ea1113ed.

S. Tanaka, K. Shigekawa, and M. Takashima, “DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUILDING DAMAGE SELF-INSPECTION SYSTEM FOR EARTHQUAKE DISASTER.”

S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.

J. Lou, J. Xu, and K. Wang, “Study on Construction Quality Control of Urban Complex Project Based on BIM,” in Procedia Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, 2017, pp. 668–676. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.215.

A. Urlainis and I. M. Shohet, “A Comprehensive Approach to Earthquake-Resilient Infrastructure: Integrating Maintenance with Seismic Fragility Curves,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 9, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13092265.

H. Kurnio, A. Fekete, F. Naz, C. Norf, and R. Jüpner, “Resilience learning and indigenous knowledge of earthquake risk in Indonesia,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 62, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102423.

Z. He, D. Wang, L. Fang, Z. Ren, and X. Xu, “Preface to the special issue on major earthquake hazards and disaster reduction,” Natural Hazards Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 33–35, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nhres.2021.06.006.

A. Fiamingo, M. Bosco, and M. R. Massimino, “The role of soil in structure response of a building damaged by the 26 December 2018 earthquake in Italy,” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 937–953, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.06.010.

M. Santamaria-Ariza, H. S. Sousa, J. C. Matos, and M. H. Faber, “An exploratory bibliometric analysis of risk, resilience, and sustainability management of transport infrastructure systems,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 97. Elsevier Ltd, Oct. 15, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104063.